WORST ABUSERS -- FOOTBALL PLAYERS OR FEDERAL JUDGES?
Baton Rouge,
Louisiana
WORST
ABUSERS --
FOOTBALL
PLAYERS OR FEDERAL JUDGES?
New allegations of physical
abuse seem to surface daily. The most recent downpour began with the media
release of a hotel surveillance video showing Baltimore Ravens running back Ray
Rice punching his girlfriend in the face, leaving her knocked out on the
elevator floor -- and leaving even the most ardent NFL fans deeply disgusted. Then
came more charges against a multitude of players on teams from coast to
coast. College football took its licks
with Florida State Heisman trophy winner Jamis Winston being accused of a
number of crimes including rape. So is
it just big time athletes who can’t control themselves? Hardly. How about the reckless and unlawful
behavior of some federal judges?
We expect federal judges appointed
for life to conduct themselves with decorum and to maintain the highest levels
of legal ethics. Sad to say, however,
that these protectors of the public trust are often as wild, irresponsible, and
out of control as any NFL player. A
number of federal judges, particularly in the South, have recently been guilty
of both physical abuse as well as actions that seriously compromise, what
should be, a high code of conduct.
The latest judicial abuser is
federal judge Mark Fuller from Alabama.
His first wife accused him of domestic violence and drug abuse. But that was just a warm up. Fuller’s second wife called 911 from an
Atlanta motel room recently, saying the judge was drunk, and pleaded to the
dispatcher, “Help me please. Please help
me. He’s beating me.” Fuller beat her, threw her to the ground,
kicked and dragged her, and hit her repeatedly in the face resulting in
multiple cuts on her mouth and forehead.
But hey, he’s a federal judge,
so no big deal. After his arrest, he was
given a plea deal allowing him to go to counseling and his record will be
expunged. Fat chance that any private
citizen would get such a deal. Fuller should have been criminally charged with
assault, immediately resign from the bench or be quickly impeached by congress.
Federal judges who abuse their
authority or commit criminal acts are often given “special consideration,”
particularly in my home state of Louisiana.
Here’s just one example from an extensive list: Early this year, Lake Charles federal judge
Patricia Minaldi tried to outrun police
on a high speed chase to her house, refused officers orders to get out of her
car, then claimed protection by being on her own property. “I'm calling
to report an intoxicated driver,” a 911 caller had stated. “She's weaving all
over the world. Tried to turn the wrong way onto the Interstate. She's crossing
the centerline, and she's weaving like an ‘S’ down the road ... Oh, she almost
got into a wreck.” Judge Minaldi pled guilty to a DWI but was quietly allowed
to go on probation for a year. Could you have gotten a similar deal?
Then there’s the Fifth Circuit
Court of Appeals in New Orleans, hands down the most dysfunctional federal circuit
court in America. Just check out some of the recent headlines concerning what
used to be a respected court.
Fifth
Circuit Covers Up Serious Judicial Misconduct!
Another
Conflict of Interest Uncovered on the Fifth Circuit!
Judicial
Diva Gone Wild? Chief Judge Tells Fellow Judge to “Shut Up!”
Chief
Judge Attacks Fellow Judge!
Pattern
of Misconduct Demands Full Investigation of Fifth Circuit Judges!
Judge
Edith Clement has been particularly singled out recently for doing, according
to press reports, “whatever she pleases.” Morning
Advocate Columnist James Gill recently wrote, “Clement, who sits on the
appeals court, is also on the board of a foundation bankrolled by Big Oil.
Thus, she gets to swank around luxury Montana resorts gratis before returning
home to write opinions in BP’s favor that strike her colleagues as
eccentric.” She’s been called in press
reports a secrecy freak, a “Closet Fascist,” and issued rulings that the Times Picayune has labeled “patently
un-American.”
As I
have written before, federal
court watchers have a name for federal judges who lack the scholarship, the
temperament, the learning, and who are simply in the wrong occupation.
They are called “gray mice.” It seems pretty obvious that the Fifth circuit
Court of Appeals is full of such critters.
Yes, there are a number of high
caliber, principled, and competent federal judges in Louisiana and the rest of
the South. But a few tainted judges can
give them all a bad name. Ben Franklin
often talked about a few bad apples spoiling the reputation of the whole
bunch. We could no doubt put rotten apples,
some NFL football players, and a few federal judges who feel that they are
privileged all in the same barrel.
********
Peace
and Justice
Jim
Brown
Jim Brown’s syndicated column
appears each week in numerous newspapers throughout the nation and on websites
worldwide. You can read all his past columns and see continuing updates
at http://www.jimbrownusa.com. You can also hear Jim’s
nationally syndicated radio show each Sunday morning from 9 am till 11:00 am,
central time, on the Genesis Communications Network, with a live stream at http://www.jimbrownusa.com.