Performance Based Pay for Public Officials
Thursday, April 3rd, 208
STAND UNDER THE ARCH
TO EARN THE BIG BUCKS IN STATE GOVERNMENT
How do you put a dollar value on the worth of a public official? That's the issue being debated in the Baton Rouge State Capitol this week. The new Economic Development Secretary is asking approval for a salary of $320,000 a year. His assistant is requesting a salary as deputy secretary of $235,000 a year. These amounts are significantly above what other economic development directors are making throughout the South. So how do you justify such large increases?
Is such a high salary a "Hail Mary pass" in a desperate effort to try to do some catching up economically in
LSU football coach Les Miles will pocket some three and a half million dollars this year, making him one of the highest-paid football coaches in the nation. He received such an enormous salary package based on results. It's the old adage that you get what you pay for, and with
Stephen Moret, who is requesting this major salary increase, says he will work seven days a week. But a lot of people work that hard. Should time and work be the only criteria in paying public employees? Why not pay the governor, the secretary of economic development, the superintendent of education, and a cross-section of other public officials that directly affect our lives, based on a scale of how well they perform and what results they achieve?
It seems like someone is always giving the re-assurance that comes from the bogus public versus private sector comparisons. Fortune 500 CEOs make on average $10 million. So some would argue that paying the Governor of Louisiana $125,000 a year to oversee a $30 billion enterprise is a real bargain! But what about results?
Experimentation with performance pay in the public sector is on the grow. A
All this aside, the heart of our query is about pegging the pay of the governor and his top assistants to performance. I would surmise that most voters in
But can you create an accountability and production index in government? I think you can. This would be a challenge for key economists at
I suggest starting with the "misery index” we've heard so much about. This so-called misery index, you may recall, is the sum of the
Now this should just be the beginning. As Governor Jindal often tells us, future economic growth in
Finally, I would factor in consumer confidence. Are the voters getting tangible results? Are they happy with the performance of their top public officials? If you own shares of stock, and have little confidence in your company investment, you simply sell the stock. The average Joe ought to be able to put in his two cents worth as to the value he's getting out of
So to Stephen Moret and other top officials working for the Louisiana Governor, I say make your case and ask the salary level you think you are worth. But just like in the private sector, be prepared to defend the bottom line. The proof of course is in the pudding. Be accountable for the results that take place. And if you succeed, reap the benefits
In ancient
So pay these pied pipers of change and economic growth the big bucks they say they are worth. But keep them directly under the arch of performance, and let voters know there will be a day of reckoning if this promise of change and results plummet to the ground.
******
“Effective leadership is not about making speeches or being liked;
leadership is defined by results not attributes."
Peter Drucker
Peace and Justice.
Jim Brown
Jim’s radio show on 995 fm from
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home