Little Confidence in the Political System!
Thursday,
June 6th, 2013
Las
Vegas, Nevada
WHY YOUNG
VOTERS ARE DISENGAGED FROM POLITICS!
Do
young voters really care about who runs their local, state and federal
government? Whatever buzz inspired younger
voters to support Barack Osama in 2008 has been severely diminished by the
gridlock in Washington. Voters under thirty
(and the rest of us, for that matter) have witnessed nothing but conflict and
partisan politics while the economy languishes and major problems go
unresolved. The idealism of youth, many
would argue, is being replaced by a cynicism towards those in charge, and this
includes the President right down to the local level.
Recently,
I sat down with a number of young people in New Orleans who are living in an
upbeat, revitalized part of the city called the Warehouse District. Some of the Crescent City’s more famous
restaurants along with new upscale shops and warehouses that have been turned
into apartments and condos are located in this area. Similar neighborhoods,
filled with young people, can be found in cities across the country.
These
young people told me that they are just not that interested in politics at any
level. In the 2012 election, the turnout
among registered voters below 30 was a bit less than 50%. But half of all young voters have not
registered. So that means a turnout of
less than 25%. This was a slight drop
from the 2008 election. But many young
voters tell pollsters, “yes I vote, but it really won’t make much of a
difference.” As one 28 year old told me in New Orleans, “Government is just not
relevant to what I’m trying to do. You
hear all these promises, but nothing really changes. I don’t think any politician can make a difference
in my life.”
Another
young man, who is developing a graphics design company, said he could sum up
the problem in one word. “Engagement. There’s a disconnect because most elected
officials don’t engage with the people they represent. They tell us things,
they do all the talking, but they never seem to listen. We have no way to express ourselves. There is no interaction.”
Software
pioneer Tim O’Reilly echoed these thoughts in an article in TechCrunch magazine, where he wrote:
“Too often, we think of government as a kind of vending machine. We put in our
taxes, and get out services: roads, bridges, hospitals, fire brigades, police
protection…. and when the vending machine doesn't give us what we want, we
protest. Our idea of citizen engagement has somehow been reduced to shaking the
vending machine.”
This
vending machine analogy is a good one. Not
only do you often not get what you want, both the machine and government have
made the decision of just what you can buy or get in the first place. You are at the mercy of the information that
the system allows you to have. Oh, but
you, as a citizen, have the right to access whatever information you
want…right? Public records and all? A free flow of information, right? Hardly.
Freedom
of information has been a hallmark of American democracy since the nation’s
founding. Make the information
available, and then let the public decide. But the way it should be and the way
it is in practice is not always the same. In the ‘70s, when I served as a
Louisiana State Senator, I authored and enacted into law what at the time was
considered to be the strongest open meetings and public records legislation in
the country. And today, we have the technology
– the Internet, the huge online data bases, and the cloud -- that should make
access to this information we need to make good decisions about our government
so much easier.
But in
spite of the advanced technology, little by little, particularly at the state
level, questionable barriers have eroded the access to public information. High copying fees, long wait times, locked
government data bases, the refusal to produce requested documents based on bogus
security issues, and capricious personal decisions have thwarted the public’s
right to know. Many of these obstacles
are put in place by public officials wanting to conduct their business in
secret. Many citizens, particularly the younger,
more idealistic voters are turned off by what they see as political cynicism. They rightly feel that the information is
paid for with their tax dollars, and that they have the right to see it. Too many elected officials are offering only
the vending machine, where in a world of the cloud and other advanced
technology, most of this information should be easily available to whoever
cares to access it over the Internet.
My
young voices in New Orleans were unanimous in feeling that the agenda of most
bureaucrats and elected officials is to keep the status quo. One young woman put it bluntly: “Look, we’re all into networking and building
businesses with new technology. Most of
us see government not as a help, but as a hindrance. We just need for them to open up their
information base, then just get out of the way and leave us alone.”
Another
young man asked, where’s innovation, where’s the creativity in government? He quoted Einstein’s thoughts that
“Imagination is more important than knowledge.” “I have a number of bright, imaginative
friends that are doing some really cool things and creating value,” he said. “Where’s
the vision in the public sector?”
Knowing
that I’d been Louisiana’s chief elections officer as Secretary of State back in
the ‘80s, my group zinged me over the archaic election process, “You can do about
anything on line at home, around the clock.
You can text, call an 800 number to vote on American Idol. But voting? Long lines, limited time, hanging chads; why
so many barriers? That’s so last
century!”
What these
young people are saying is that the boundaries need to come down. No more toleration
of the vending machine. Make government
a two way street. Let technology put
many decisions -- more power of government -- in the hands of citizens. Will this inspire younger voters back into
the participatory fold? Will politicians stand in the way of what they will
perceive as radical change? And if they
do, are we just going stand by and allow the gridlock of partisan politics and
the alienation of young voters to continue?
********
“I'm
not afraid to shake up the system, and government needs more shaking up than
any other system I know.”
Ann
Richards
Peace and Justice
Jim Brown
Jim
Brown’s syndicated column appears each week in numerous newspapers throughout
the nation and on websites worldwide. You can read all his past columns
and see continuing updates at http://www.jimbrownusa.com. You can also hear Jim’s
nationally syndicated radio show each Sunday morning from 9 am till 11:00 am,
central time, on the Genesis Radio Network, with a live stream at http://www.jimbrownusa.com.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home