TOO MANY INNOCENTS GETTING THE DEATH PENALTY!
Baton Rouge,
Louisiana
TOO
MANY INNOCENTS GETTING THE DEATH PENALTY!
There is a
reason the death penalty is rarely enforced anymore, particularly in the
federal judicial system. Too many
innocent victims are being convicted, based on cover-ups and the withholding of
exculpatory evidence by some federal and state prosecutors. A recent study published in the National
Academy of Sciences concludes that some 4.1 percent of inmates on death row are
innocent. More than four percent. If that were the rate of airplanes crashing,
would you fly?
Legal scholar
John Whitehead, who writes about the pursuit of justice for The Rutherford
Institute, and who has appeared on my nationally syndicated radio program, says
the criminal justice system in the U.S. is consistently error-bound and
flawed. He writes of a recent Columbia
University study on 5,760 capital cases where “the report found an overall
error rate of 68%. In other words,
courts found serious reversible errors in nearly 7 out of 10 capitol
cases….with the most common errors involved prosecutorial suppression of evidence and other
misconduct.”
Receiving the
death penalty is a regular occurrence in my home state of Louisiana. What also is becoming the norm is the fact
that a number of those convicted, and on their way to the gas chamber, are
eventually found to be innocent. For
years, the Bayou State has held the title of having the highest incarceration
rate in the world. It now has taken on
the dubious title of having case after case of death row inmates being
convicted based on the withholding of evidence that would prove their
innocence.
New
Orleans has become the cesspool for the innocent being convicted of capital
crimes and sentenced to death. One of
the most egregious is the case of New Orleanian
John Thompson, who was convicted back in 1982 of first-degree murder and given
the death sentence. He came within days of being executed after spending
14 years on death row and 18 year’s total in prison. Five different prosecutors
were involved in the case and all knew that a blood test and other key evidence
had been hidden that showed Thompson was innocent.
On his deathbed and dying of cancer, one of the prosecutors
confessed to a colleague that he had hidden the exculpatory blood sample.
The colleague waited five more years before admitting that he too knew
of the hidden evidence. Thompson, after 18 years, received a new trial,
and his lawyers were finally able to produce ten difference pieces of
evidence that had been kept from Thompson, that overwhelming showed he was
innocent. The new jury took less than 35 minutes to find him not guilty.
Hiding
evidence that can find the accused innocent is nothing new for prosecutors in
New Orleans, both in state and federal court as well as with the FBI. The
Innocence Project of New Orleans reviewed a number of convictions over the past
25 years in the city and concluded that prosecutors have a “legacy” of
suppressing evidence. The Project said 36 men convicted in Orleans Parish alleged
prosecutorial misconduct. Nineteen have since had their sentences overturned or
reduced as a result. In 19 of 25 capital cases, the prosecutors withheld
favorable evidence.
Then there is the chilling case of Dan Bright, convicted and put
on death row for a murder he did not commit. Evidence came out years after his
conviction that the FBI, thanks to a credible informant, had been in possession
of the name of the actual killer all along. Luckily for Bright, because of the
unconstitutional withholding of key evidence by the prosecution and the FBI,
his conviction was thrown out, and he now is a free man.
The
foreman of White’s jury, who recommended that he be put to death, was Kathleen
Norman, who was a guest on my radio show on several occasions before her
untimely death several years ago. She was so incensed over White’s
wrongful conviction and the hiding of evidence that would have cleared him by
the FBI, that she became head of the Louisiana Innocence project, helping
others like White mount a credible defense.
Questionable
conduct by rogue prosecutors who withhold information that could prove the
innocence of an accused is far too prevalent.
Whether one is for or against the death penalty, there is ample evidence
that convictions of a capital crime can be a crapshoot based on the whims of
some prosecutors who too often withhold exculpatory evidence. Tough luck if you are innocent. Too often, justice is being compromised. And that’s just not right!
********
“This is the world we live in, and justice is not always fulfilled!”
Bobby Lee Swagger-movie Shooter.
Peace and
Justice
Jim Brown
Jim Brown’s syndicated column
appears each week in numerous newspapers throughout the nation and on websites
worldwide. You can read all his past columns and see continuing updates
at http://www.jimbrownusa.com. You can also hear Jim’s
nationally syndicated radio show each Sunday morning from 9 am till 11:00 am,
central time, on the Genesis Radio Network, with a live stream at http://www.jimbrownusa.com.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home