E-MAIL SCANDALS-CLINTON AND JINDAL?
Thursday, March 12th, l2015
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
E-MAIL SCANDALS-CLINTON AND JINDAL?
It’s going to take a lot more than old emails to derail
Hillary Clinton’s grasp of the Democratic presidential nomination next
year. Few voters really care how she
communicated with her staff while serving as Secretary of State. Republicans think they are circling the
wagons in major attack mode. But if they
look in their own backyard, a number of GOP presidential wannabes, including
Louisiana’s fair haired quixotic candidate Bobby Jindal, have the same problem
of not following the law when it comes to producing emails.
Clinton
took office in 2009, when state department regulations affirmed that: “It is the Department’s
general policy that normal day-to-day operations be conducted on an authorized
Automated Information System.” However,
the internal rules list numerous exceptions, and the agency has stated that it
had “no prohibition” on the use of private email for work purposes. The only specific requirement for all
employees was that any e-mail sent or received from a personal account had to
be kept and maintained so as to be included in the State Department’s personal
records.
A
number of Republican presidential candidates have maintained private e-mail
accounts to carry on public business.
Former Florida governor Jeb Bush maintained his own server and released numerous
emails he felt were required under state law.
But just like Clinton, how he determined what was “public” was left up
to him. Texas governor Rick Perry agrees
that his emails on state business should be public, so but he simply wipes them
out every thirty days. So much for
maintaining pubic records.
Minnesota
Governor Scott Walker and his staff used private email accounts to carry on
public business mingled with political campaigning that led to the conviction
of several of his appointees. And New
Jersey governor Chris Christie is presently entangled in a number of lawsuits
for ignoring his state’s public records law.
At
one time, Louisiana had the strongest public records law in America. I know a little about this as I was the
author of Louisiana’s first public records act along with the state’s first
open meetings law back in 1976 when I was in the State Senate. But little by little, the intent of public
transparency has been undermined.
Jindal, according to the Associated Press, uses a private email account
to communicate with his staff, just like Clinton. Public records requests are
generally ignored by Jindal and his staff, so the Governor will be long gone
before his public business decisions through email are revealed. That is, assuming he and his staff do not
“scrub” their email servers.
I
agree with a limited exclusion to the public records requirements for contract
negotiations along with decisions on higher and firing of public
employees. But such exceptions should be
narrowly interpreted and violations should be strongly enforced. The test is simply one of content driven
analysis in that if an action is done in the pursuit of the public interest, it
becomes a public document. Unfortunately, Louisiana has gone from a state the
led the nation in openness and transparency in public decisions, to a backward
bastion of secrecy and unaccountability.
Should
public officials carry on public business through private e-mail accounts? Absolutely not. It is so easy today to set up several email
accounts on the same server. If public
activity is being undertaken, then use the public account. If someone is conducting private business,
they can easily switch over to a private account. But a public official, who uses a sequestered
email account that only he or she has access to, is violating both the spirit
and the letter of the law in most states including Louisiana,
The
public’s right to know is a basic premise for any democracy. Communications that lead to public decisions
by public officials need to be scrutinized.
That applies to Hillary Clinton who is presently on the email hot seat,
as well as Bobby Jindal and all the other presidential aspirants. It’s the right thing to do, the public
deserves such openness, and it’s the law.
********
“A government by secrecy
benefits no one. It breeds distrust, dampens the fervor of its citizens and
mocks their loyalty.”
Louisiana Senator Russell Long
Peace and Justice
Jim Brown
Jim
Brown’s syndicated column appears each week in numerous newspapers throughout
the nation and on websites worldwide. You can read all his past columns
and see continuing updates at http://www.jimbrownusa.com. You can also hear Jim’s
nationally syndicated radio show each Sunday morning from 9 am till 11:00 am,
central time, on the Genesis Radio Network, with a live stream at http://www.jimbrownusa.com.
It’s going to take a lot more than old emails to derail
Hillary Clinton’s grasp of the Democratic presidential nomination next
year. Few voters really care how she
communicated with her staff while serving as Secretary of State. Republicans think they are circling the
wagons in major attack mode. But if they
look in their own backyard, a number of GOP presidential wannabes, including
Louisiana’s fair haired quixotic candidate Bobby Jindal, have the same problem
of not following the law when it comes to producing emails.
Clinton
took office in 2009, when state department regulations affirmed that: “It is the Department’s
general policy that normal day-to-day operations be conducted on an authorized
Automated Information System.” However,
the internal rules list numerous exceptions, and the agency has stated that it
had “no prohibition” on the use of private email for work purposes. The only specific requirement for all
employees was that any e-mail sent or received from a personal account had to
be kept and maintained so as to be included in the State Department’s personal
records.
A
number of Republican presidential candidates have maintained private e-mail
accounts to carry on public business.
Former Florida governor Jeb Bush maintained his own server and released numerous
emails he felt were required under state law.
But just like Clinton, how he determined what was “public” was left up
to him. Texas governor Rick Perry agrees
that his emails on state business should be public, so but he simply wipes them
out every thirty days. So much for
maintaining pubic records.
Minnesota
Governor Scott Walker and his staff used private email accounts to carry on
public business mingled with political campaigning that led to the conviction
of several of his appointees. And New
Jersey governor Chris Christie is presently entangled in a number of lawsuits
for ignoring his state’s public records law.
At
one time, Louisiana had the strongest public records law in America. I know a little about this as I was the
author of Louisiana’s first public records act along with the state’s first
open meetings law back in 1976 when I was in the State Senate. But little by little, the intent of public
transparency has been undermined.
Jindal, according to the Associated Press, uses a private email account
to communicate with his staff, just like Clinton. Public records requests are
generally ignored by Jindal and his staff, so the Governor will be long gone
before his public business decisions through email are revealed. That is, assuming he and his staff do not
“scrub” their email servers.
I
agree with a limited exclusion to the public records requirements for contract
negotiations along with decisions on higher and firing of public
employees. But such exceptions should be
narrowly interpreted and violations should be strongly enforced. The test is simply one of content driven
analysis in that if an action is done in the pursuit of the public interest, it
becomes a public document. Unfortunately, Louisiana has gone from a state the
led the nation in openness and transparency in public decisions, to a backward
bastion of secrecy and unaccountability.
Should
public officials carry on public business through private e-mail accounts? Absolutely not. It is so easy today to set up several email
accounts on the same server. If public
activity is being undertaken, then use the public account. If someone is conducting private business,
they can easily switch over to a private account. But a public official, who uses a sequestered
email account that only he or she has access to, is violating both the spirit
and the letter of the law in most states including Louisiana,
The
public’s right to know is a basic premise for any democracy. Communications that lead to public decisions
by public officials need to be scrutinized.
That applies to Hillary Clinton who is presently on the email hot seat,
as well as Bobby Jindal and all the other presidential aspirants. It’s the right thing to do, the public
deserves such openness, and it’s the law.
********
“A government by secrecy
benefits no one. It breeds distrust, dampens the fervor of its citizens and
mocks their loyalty.”
Louisiana Senator Russell Long
Peace and Justice
Jim Brown
Jim
Brown’s syndicated column appears each week in numerous newspapers throughout
the nation and on websites worldwide. You can read all his past columns
and see continuing updates at http://www.jimbrownusa.com. You can also hear Jim’s
nationally syndicated radio show each Sunday morning from 9 am till 11:00 am,
central time, on the Genesis Radio Network, with a live stream at http://www.jimbrownusa.com.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home