BETRAYING YOUR POLITICAL PARTY IN LOUISIANA
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
BETRAYING YOUR POLITICAL PARTY IN
LOUISIANA
You may not have heard, but there is apparently a strict code of
loyalty among Republican candidates in Louisiana. They follow the rule of never
speaking ill about a fellow republican, and they always rally behind the
parties’ choice against any democratic challenger.
That’s why the wrath of the party reigned down on Jay Dardenne, the
current Lt. Governor and unsuccessful gubernatorial candidate in the recent
statewide election. Dardenne finished
forth and had the audacity to endorse Democratic challenger Rep. John Bell
Edwards. Republican officials were quick to castigate Dardenne for his
unforgiveable blunder.
The national Republican Party Chairman, Reince Priebus, called
Dardenne’s action an “act of betrayal to the Republican Party.” Back home in Louisiana, state party boss
Roger Villere labeled Dardenne “the Nick
Saban of Louisiana politics.” That might
not be the best shot to take since Saban seems to have LSU’s number, roundly
trouncing the Tigers just two weekends ago.
So is it an unforgivable party betrayal to cross party lines in the
Bayou State? Hardly. Both democrats and republicans have been
doing it for years. A good example, one
that these outraged GOP official don’t want to mention today, was the
gubernatorial election of 1979. I remember
the details well since I too was on the ballot running my first statewide race
for Secretary of State.
Republican Congressman Dave Treen led the first primary field of
candidates with Lt. Governor Jimmy Fitzmorris and Public Service Commissioner
Louis Lambert, both democrats, in hot pursuit.
Jimmy Fitz initially led the vote totals for second place and a run off
spot against Treen. But when the voting
machines were opened three days later, Lambert jumped ahead of Fitz and claimed
the run off spot. The Fitzmorris team
cried foul and immediately filed suit to overturn the results.
Prior to my election as Secretary of State, there was no official
count to determine results on election night. The old-time voting machines spit
our a printed results card that a voting precinct clerk would drive down to the
clerk of court’s office. There the results sat until the following Tuesday’s
actual vote count.
After a lengthy court fight, democrat Lambert was declared the
victor to face republican Treen in the run off.
The four candidates behind Treen and Lambert in the vote count were all
democrats. And guess what? All four democrats endorsed republican Dave
Treen! Yes, there was some mumbling by
democrats about betrayals. Treen barely won and the four endorsements certainly
made the difference. Will the same thing
happen on November 21st?
Upon taking office, I formed an Elections Integrity Commission to
investigate the voter fraud allegations.
When the official count took place three days after the election, there
were a number of changes in the totals.
Many were based on problems with the old voting machines. Polling commissioners had to open the backs
of the machines on election night, stand up on a stool, and read small vote
totals often in dim light.
I observed one vote count at a precinct where an older
commissioner looked at the back of the voting machine, squinted and tried hard
to make out the small numbers. “Hum, let’s see. I think it’s 325, no it’s
225.” He just had a hard time reading
the totals, and mistakes were made. When the official counting took place the
following Tuesday, it was daylight with a number of officials reading each tally.
So after an exhaustive study, my commission concluded that it was human error,
not voter fraud that caused discrepancies in the final vote count. Yes, and new
voting machines were ordered.
Louisiana is the only state in the nation that has an open or
“jungle” primary, where all the candidates, democratic and republican, run
together. The top two vote getters enter a run-off regardless of party
affiliation. It is hard to demand party
loyalty when two candidates from the same party often face each other in a run
off. Political parties can’t offer any
help unless their candidate is facing an opposing party candidate.
What this means is that party officials might not be happy about one
of their candidates crossing party lines. Oh, they might try to even the score
in a future election. But in the scheme
of things, party officials who demand total loyalty by losing candidates look
petty and vindictive. They certainly do not help their cause to win elections.
********
I’ll be damned if I’m going to pay for a
landslide.”
Joseph P.
Kennedy
Peace and Justice
Jim Brown
Jim Brown’s
syndicated column appears each week in numerous newspapers throughout the
nation and on websites worldwide. You can read all his past columns and
see continuing updates at http://www.jimbrownusa.com. You can also hear Jim’s
nationally syndicated radio show each Sunday morning from 9 am till 11:00 am,
central time, on the Genesis Radio Network, with a live stream at http://www.jimbrownusa.com.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home